Efficient and Efficient Firearms Industry Defense
Mathis & Donheiser defends designers, manufacturers and sellers of guns in firearms litigation throughout the United States. The Dallas law firm has built a reputation as a leader in firearms industry defense by successfully handling complex gun litigation and other matters related to defective products.
A Trial Decision That Made Legal History
The law firm's work in the area of firearms litigation began with an especially high-profile case involving a teenager who became paralyzed when a schoolmate's gun accidentally discharged.
Attorney Randal Mathis handled this groundbreaking firearms industry defense case, a lawsuit that received national attention. If the case had been won by the plaintiff, it would have created legal precedent that required handgun makers and sellers to pay millions of dollars to handgun victims, even in cases where a gun was improperly or illegally used.
The case was discussed prominently in The New York Times, Newsweek, The Washington Post and the Dallas Times Herald. To read more about the case, please refer to the newspaper articles posted on this site.
Continued Achievement in Firearms Litigation
Attorneys at Mathis & Donheiser use this experience to provide legal defense to leading companies and individuals in the firearms industry facing potentially damaging litigation. The law firm has earned an AV rating* under Martindale Hubbell's peer rating system and is listed in the Martindale Hubbell Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.
Contact Mathis & Donheiser
To speak confidentially with an attorney at the Dallas, Texas, law firm of Mathis & Donheiser, please call 214-303-1919.
*CV, BV and AV are registered certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell Ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.
